xAI, founded by Elon Musk, launched Grok 4 on July 9, 2025. This next-generation AI model promises to redefine intelligence. It aims to outshine competitors like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and DeepSeek. In this blog post, we explore Grok 4’s benchmarks, differences from Grok 3, popular use cases, benefits, and pricing. We also compare it with other leading AI models. Let’s dive into why Grok 4 is a game-changer for AI enthusiasts, developers, and businesses.
What is Grok 4?
Grok 4 is xAI’s latest AI model. It’s designed to deliver smarter, faster, and more accurate responses. Built on a massive computational framework, it uses 200,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs. This is double the compute power of Grok 3. The model supports text and image processing. It offers a 256,000-token context window, making it ideal for complex tasks. xAI claims Grok 4 achieves PhD-level reasoning across all subjects.
Grok 4 Launch Highlights
xAI unveiled Grok 4 via a livestream on X on July 9, 2025. Elon Musk called it “the most powerful AI model” yet. The launch introduced two variants: Grok 4 (general-purpose) and Grok 4 Code (specialized for coding). A premium tier, Grok 4 Heavy, was also announced. It uses five coordinated Grok 4 replicas for enhanced performance. The model is now available to X Premium+ subscribers and through xAI’s API.
Benchmarks: How Grok 4 Performs
Grok 4 sets new standards in AI performance. It topped the Artificial Analysis Intelligence Index with a score of 73. This beats OpenAI’s o3 (70), Google’s Gemini 2.5 Pro (70), Anthropic’s Claude 4 Opus (64), and DeepSeek R1 (68). Independent tests like ARC-AGI-2 show Grok 4 scoring 16.2%, nearly double Claude Opus 4’s score.
Key Benchmark Results
| Benchmark | Grok 4 Score | Comparison |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 88% | Outperforms Gemini 2.0 Pro (62%), GPT-4o (54%) |
| AIME 2024 | 94–95% | Leads OpenAI o1 (72%), DeepSeek R1 (68%) |
| Humanity’s Last Exam | 25% | Highest score among all models |
| LiveCodeBench (LCB) | 57 | Surpasses GPT-4o, Gemini 2 Pro |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 16.2% | Nearly doubles Claude Opus 4 |
Grok 4 excels in math, science, and coding. It solves complex problems faster than rivals. For instance, it scored 100% on AIME math tests, compared to Grok 3’s 93.3%. Its reasoning capabilities shine in multi-step problem-solving.
Grok 3 vs. Grok 4: What’s New?
Grok 4 is a massive leap from Grok 3. Here are the key differences:
- Compute Power: Grok 4 uses 200,000 Nvidia H100 GPUs, 10x more than Grok 3’s 100,000. This boosts speed and accuracy.
- Context Window: Grok 4 has a 256,000-token context window, smaller than Grok 3’s 1 million but optimized for efficiency.
- Reasoning Modes: Grok 4’s “Thinking” mode is always on, unlike Grok 3’s optional Think mode. It also introduces a “Code” mode for developers.
- Data Training: Grok 4 was trained on 100x more data than Grok 2, with 10x more reinforcement learning compute. This improves real-world performance.
- Multimodality: Grok 4 enhances image analysis, though it lags slightly behind ChatGPT and Gemini in image generation.
- Performance: Grok 4 outperforms Grok 3 in every benchmark, especially in math (94–95% vs. 93.3%) and science (88% vs. 75.4%).
Grok 4 is faster, smarter, and more versatile. It handles complex tasks with ease, making it a stronger contender than Grok 3.
Popular Use Cases for Grok 4
Grok 4 is built for diverse applications. Its advanced reasoning and real-time data access make it a top choice for many fields. Here are the most popular use cases:
1. Coding and Software Development
Grok 4 Code excels in debugging, code generation, and explaining algorithms. Developers report 30% faster debugging sessions compared to Grok 3. It supports languages like Python, JavaScript, and C++.
2. Scientific Research
Grok 4’s reasoning shines in STEM fields. It solves complex math problems and analyzes scientific data. Researchers use it for hypothesis testing and literature reviews.
3. Content Creation
Grok 4 crafts engaging articles, marketing copy, and creative stories. Its witty tone adds personality to outputs, unlike the neutral style of ChatGPT.
4. Real-Time Data Analysis
With DeepSearch, Grok 4 scours the web and X for up-to-date insights. It’s ideal for market research, trend analysis, and news aggregation.
5. Education and Tutoring
Grok 4 explains complex concepts clearly. It’s used in schools and universities for math, science, and coding tutorials. Its step-by-step reasoning boosts learning.
6. Game Development
Grok 4 supports creative coding for games. It generates scripts and designs game mechanics, though outputs may need refinement.
Benefits of Using Grok 4
Grok 4 offers unique advantages. Here’s why it stands out:
- Advanced Reasoning: Solves complex problems with PhD-level accuracy.
- Real-Time Insights: DeepSearch provides current data from the web and X.
- Speed: Faster response times for coding and research tasks.
- Transparency: Thinking mode shows step-by-step reasoning, building trust.
- Customization: Adapts dynamically to user input, ideal for tailored solutions.
- Integration: Seamlessly works with X and xAI’s API for developers.
- Wit and Humor: Adds personality to responses, making interactions engaging.
These benefits make Grok 4 a powerful tool for professionals, students, and casual users.
Grok 4 vs. ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and DeepSeek
Grok 4 competes with top AI models. Here’s a detailed comparison across key areas.
Grok 4 vs. ChatGPT
- Performance: Grok 4 outperforms ChatGPT (GPT-4o) in math (94–95% vs. 72% on AIME) and science (88% vs. 54% on GPQA). ChatGPT excels in creative writing and multilingual tasks.
- Reasoning: Grok 4’s always-on Thinking mode rivals ChatGPT’s Reason mode. Grok 4 is faster for technical tasks.
- Accessibility: ChatGPT offers a free tier and paid plans ($20/month). Grok 4 requires X Premium+ ($16/month) or SuperGrok ($30/month).
- Use Cases: ChatGPT is better for content creation and customer service. Grok 4 shines in coding and STEM research.
- Image Generation: ChatGPT’s DALL·E 3 integration outperforms Grok 4’s Aurora.
Grok 4 vs. Gemini
- Performance: Grok 4 beats Gemini 2.5 Pro in reasoning (73 vs. 70 on AAI Index). Gemini’s 1–2 million token context window surpasses Grok 4’s 256,000.
- Reasoning: Grok 4’s Thinking mode is more consistent than Gemini’s. Gemini excels in multimedia tasks.
- Accessibility: Gemini offers free preview tiers and API access. Grok 4 is limited to X Premium+ or SuperGrok subscribers.
- Use Cases: Gemini is ideal for Google ecosystem users and multimedia tasks. Grok 4 is better for technical reasoning.
- Image Generation: Gemini outperforms Grok 4 in context recognition and image generation.
Grok 4 vs. Claude
- Performance: Grok 4 surpasses Claude 4 Opus (73 vs. 64 on AAI Index). Claude excels in long-form content and conversational depth.
- Reasoning: Grok 4’s Thinking mode is stronger than Claude’s. Claude’s 100,000-token context is smaller than Grok 4’s.
- Accessibility: Claude’s Pro plan costs $20/month. Grok 4’s pricing is higher ($30/month for SuperGrok).
- Use Cases: Claude is best for customer service and long-form writing. Grok 4 leads in STEM and coding.
- Image Generation: Claude lacks strong image generation, giving Grok 4 an edge.
Grok 4 vs. DeepSeek
- Performance: Grok 4 outperforms DeepSeek R1 (73 vs. 68 on AAI Index). DeepSeek excels in cost-efficient reasoning.
- Reasoning: Grok 4 is faster (67 seconds vs. 343 seconds for a logic puzzle). DeepSeek’s 32,000-token context is smaller.
- Accessibility: DeepSeek is open-source and free. Grok 4 requires paid subscriptions.
- Use Cases: DeepSeek is great for local, private reasoning tasks. Grok 4 is better for real-time data analysis.
- Image Generation: Grok 4’s Aurora is more versatile than DeepSeek’s limited capabilities.
Comparison Table
| Feature | Grok 4 | ChatGPT | Gemini | Claude | DeepSeek |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AAI Index Score | 73 | 70 (o3) | 70 (2.5 Pro) | 64 (Opus 4) | 68 (R1) |
| Context Window | 256K | 32K–200K | 1M–2M | 100K | 32K |
| Reasoning Mode | Thinking (always-on) | Reason | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Free Tier | No | Yes | Yes | No | Yes |
| Best Use Case | Coding, STEM | Content, Multilingual | Multimedia | Long-form Content | Cost-Efficient Reasoning |
| Image Generation | Aurora (Moderate) | DALL·E 3 (Strong) | Strong | Weak | Weak |
Pricing Plans for Grok 4
Grok 4 is available through multiple pricing tiers. Here’s a breakdown:
- X Premium+: Costs $16/month (web) or $22/month (mobile). Includes access to Grok 4 and real-time X data. Ideal for casual users.
- SuperGrok: $30/month or $300/year. Offers higher usage quotas and access to Grok 4 Heavy. Best for professionals and businesses.
- SuperGrok Heavy: $300/month. Provides early access to Grok 4 Heavy and new features. Targets enterprises and power users.
- API Pricing: Starts at $3 per million input tokens and $15 per million output tokens. A faster version costs $5/$25 per million tokens. Grok 4 Mini is cheaper.
Pricing Comparison
| Model | Free Tier | Paid Plans | API Pricing |
|---|---|---|---|
| Grok 4 | No | $16–$300/month | $3–$25/million tokens |
| ChatGPT | Yes | $20–$200/month | Per-token pricing |
| Gemini | Yes | Free preview, API TBD | Competitive API rates |
| Claude | No | $20/month | Per-token pricing |
| DeepSeek | Yes | Free (open-source) | Infrastructure costs |
Grok 4’s pricing is higher than ChatGPT and Gemini. However, its advanced features justify the cost for technical users. For budget-conscious users, DeepSeek’s open-source model is a strong alternative.
Why Choose Grok 4?
Grok 4 stands out for its reasoning prowess. Its always-on Thinking mode ensures clear, step-by-step solutions. The model’s integration with X provides real-time insights, perfect for dynamic industries. Developers benefit from Grok 4 Code’s efficiency. Researchers love its scientific accuracy. Its edgy, humorous tone appeals to casual users. Despite higher costs, Grok 4 delivers unmatched value for STEM and coding tasks.
Challenges and Limitations
Grok 4 isn’t perfect. Its image generation lags behind ChatGPT and Gemini. It occasionally lacks common sense in simple tasks. Recent controversies, like offensive X posts, raised concerns about its system prompts. xAI quickly addressed these issues, but trust remains a challenge. The $300/month SuperGrok Heavy plan may deter small businesses.
How to Access Grok 4
You can use Grok 4 in several ways:
- X Platform: Available to X Premium+ subscribers. Access it via the Grok button on X’s menu.
- Grok.com: xAI’s standalone website for broader access.
- Mobile Apps: Available on iOS and Android with voice mode.
- API: Developers can integrate Grok 4 via xAI’s API.
- Grok Studio: A canvas tool for creating documents and apps. Integrates with Google Drive.
Visit x.ai/grok for subscription details and API access.
Future of Grok 4
xAI plans to enhance Grok 4’s capabilities. Image recognition improvements are expected soon. A synthesized voice feature is in development. Open-sourcing Grok 2 could inspire community-driven innovation. Elon Musk predicts Grok 4 will discover new technologies, like medicines, by 2026.
Real-World Impact
Grok 4 is reshaping industries. Developers save time with faster debugging. Researchers gain accurate scientific insights. Businesses leverage real-time data for market strategies. Its integration with Tesla cars, starting July 2025, will enhance autonomous driving. The model’s influence on AI architecture is inspiring new research.
Conclusion
Grok 4 is a bold step forward for xAI. It outperforms rivals in reasoning, coding, and STEM tasks. Its DeepSearch and Thinking modes set it apart. While pricier than ChatGPT and Gemini, its advanced features justify the cost for professionals. Image generation and occasional inaccuracies are drawbacks, but xAI is addressing them. For coders, researchers, and X users, Grok 4 is a top choice. Try it on x.ai/grok or X Premium+ to experience the future of AI.
1 thought on “xAI’s Grok 4 Launched: The Ultimate AI Breakthrough in 2025”